Analisis Hukum Terkait Disparitas Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Dan Rehabilitasi Pada Penyalahguna Narkotika (Putusan Nomor: 89/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Sgm Dan 1377/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mks)

  • Risman Risman Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Amiruddin Pabbu Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Adeh Dwi Putra Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Arlyanda Arlyanda Universitas Indonesia Timur
Keywords: Narcotics Abuse, Sentencing Disparity, Rehabilitation

Abstract

This study analyzes the disparity in judicial decisions regarding narcotics abuse for self-consumption, comparing Decision No. 89/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Sgm and Decision No. 1377/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Mks. Although both defendants were found guilty of violating Article 127(1)(a) of Law No. 35/2009, there was a significant discrepancy between rehabilitation and imprisonment sanctions. Using normative juridical research with a qualitative descriptive approach, this study finds that the disparity is driven by the availability of assessments from the Integrated Assessment Team under SEMA No. 4/2010. The author argues that a Double Track System should be prioritized to ensure parity between punitive measures and rehabilitation. This study concludes that the granting of rehabilitation should not rely solely on administrative assessment formalities but must be grounded in the defendant's right as a user requiring medical recovery to reintegrate into society.

References

Anton Prasetyo, (2019). Perekrutan Dan Kegiatan Anak Sebagai Kurir Dalam Jaringan Peredaran Narkotika, Airlangga Development Journal, Surabaya.

Antonius dkk, Analisis Ratio Decidendi Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Rumusan Pasalnya Tidak Ada Ancaman Pidana Mati (Studi Putusan No. 241/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Tjb). IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 3.

Aryo Fadlian, (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Suatu Kerangka Teoritis, Jurnal Hukum POSITUM Vol.5, No.2

Berliandista Yustianjarnimas Irianto,, (2020), “Disparitas Pidana Pada Penyalahguna Narkotika”, Jurist-Diction, Vol. 3 No. 3.

Moleong. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Riza DKK, (2023). Studi Hukum Berdasarkan Tipe-Tipe Keadilan Perspektif Aristoteles. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan.

Rizki Ridwansyah, (2023). Konsep Teori Utilitarianisme dan Penerapannya dalam Hukum Praktis di Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humanioral 1:2, 1-25.

Published
2026-03-30
How to Cite
Risman, R., Pabbu, A., Putra, A., & Arlyanda, A. (2026). Analisis Hukum Terkait Disparitas Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Dan Rehabilitasi Pada Penyalahguna Narkotika (Putusan Nomor: 89/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Sgm Dan 1377/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Mks). PETITUM, 14(01), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v14i01.1603
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.